Many people who use Twitter (now X) have known about Dr Kary Mullis’s statements about the effectiveness and (mis)use of the PCR test for a considerable time. The PCR testing regime has been used to drive the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’ narrative (and claimed ‘covid-infected’ statistics) therefore contributing to the deliberately generated fear, propaganda and coercion that has driven people to accept the experimental covid-19 jabs.

The death of Dr Mullis three months prior to the ‘pandemic’ has been questioned by many… that is because there are a number of ‘deaths’ and ‘suicides’ which seem to have befallen people who present as whistleblowers and others who seek to tell an alternative ‘truth’ and challenge ‘official’ narratives:

https://twitter.com/TheEyes2022/status/1744970685615624251

https://twitter.com/TruthCampaigns/status/1744993177285574966

https://twitter.com/jim_slip/status/1745028093415129483

The link below is to a 11 minute video explanation about the PCR tests and how they can be misinterpreted. Note the date this video was published of 19th September 2020. Significantly, read the comments people have left, even at this stage people were commenting how Dr Kary Mullis himself was saying that the PCR tests are not appropriate for viral testing, for example, one person wrote:

“The test was invented in the 1980s by Kary Mullis who won the Nobel prize for chemistry as a result. However, he said it was for research purposes only and should never be used for diagnosis. Mullis died last year but there is still video of him talking about the test and saying “If you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody”. Deaths from COVID went down to zero in August and have not risen by very much since. The small rise could just be due to false positive tests. If the government had not decided it must “test, test, test” it would not have found any justification for restricting freedom.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1Z8cSXI-Q

29 May 2024 – Flagged up by Jim Ferguson:

‘MSM Silent As Court Holds PCR Covid Tests 97% Inaccurate – Unfit for Purpose

The main stream media (MSM) in Europe and the US is deathly silent as a court determines the PCR test legally useless to test for Covid. The Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose.

So what does the MSM do? They ignore it Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centered on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests. The verdict, delivered on November 11, followed an appeal against a writ of habeas corpus filed by four Germans against the Azores Regional Health Authority.

This body had been appealing a ruling from a lower court which had found in favor of the tourists, who claimed that they were illegally confined to a hotel without their consent. The tourists were ordered to stay in the hotel over the summer after one of them tested positive for coronavirus in a PCR test – the other three were labelled close contacts and therefore made to quarantine as well.

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid. The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” #VaccineInjuries #ExcessDeaths https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/msm-silent-as-court-holds-pcr-covid-tests-97-inaccurate-unfit-for-purpose

https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1795738603164705018

***What did the creator of the PCR test, Dr Kary Mullis, say about its use? And what role did the test’s (mis)use play in driving up the numbers of people who were identified as ‘infectious’ – therefore being instructed to isolate leading to ‘contact-tracing’ and further enforced isolation …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: