3rd February 2024 – Please view the article via the link below and support ‘The Expose’ in its provision of independent journalism:
There is some fundamentally important information in this article, and as the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) constantly speak in terms of ‘the next pandemic’ and attempt to take over global health measures in their entirety, it is really important to understand the issues featured in the so-called Covid-19 pandemic. So multiple examples of ‘iatrocide’ is what the article reveals – and if you’re time-poor, scroll right down to the ‘Conclusions’ and take a look at the number of references that support this article’s content:
‘Deaths During the “First Wave” of the Pseudopandemic Were Caused by Iatrocide’ by Patricia Harrity’
‘Deaths during the “First Wave” of the Pseudopandemic were caused by Iatrocide. by Simon Lee, Science Officer, Anew UK
Iatrocide – The act of killing a patient by medical treatment; iatro- + -cide , from Greek iatros (healer) + Latin -cide (killing).
There was NO Pandemic
Incredibly, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many people still believe that the world recently experienced a deadly Coronavirus pandemic that killed millions of people. There is a considerable amount of evidence that this was in reality not a real pandemic but a pseudopandemic psy-op.
The entire covid pandemic narrative rests on two main pillars: that a novel pathogenic virus was actually identified, and that a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test could accurately identify the alleged virus. If either of these pillars are not correct, the entire covid narrative comes crashing down. Neither of them is correct.
No virus was ever properly isolated, identified, and characterised as per the scientific method and the PCR test was comprehensively shown to be a useless generator of non-specific, false positive results, by a group of independent scientists, very soon after the details of the PCR were made public in 2020.
The Epidemiological Data Also Tells Us That There Was No Pandemic.
On March 11, 2020, the coronavirus “pandemic” was declared which did initially lead to sudden surges in all-cause mortality but only in specific locations in the Western world and they were synchronous. This synchronicity is incompatible with the notion of a spreading contagious viral respiratory disease. Synchronous mortality clusters in the spring of 2020 (such as in New York, Madrid, London, Stockholm, and northern Italy) did not spread beyond those cluster hotspots.
Immediately after the WHO declared a pandemic and instructed hospitals to be ready, the death rate dramatically increased in various European countries, US States and Canadian provinces. These peaks are unprecedented in their scale and the fact that they take place outside of the usual “flu” season. They occur simultaneously in geographic areas separated by thousands of miles, yet not necessarily in neighbouring countries or provinces.
Comparisons of excess mortality across countries have actively disproved the viral hypothesis. Excess mortality most often did not cross-national borders and inter-state lines. The invisible “virus” cannot possibly specifically target the poor and disabled or respect borders. It also cannot wait until governments impose socio-economic and care protocol changes on vulnerable groups before it kills.
How could a virus spread without noticeably affecting mortality rates, then suddenly transform itself into the worst killer in a century upon command from the WHO? The geographic and temporal movement of the mortality spikes is inconsistent with what would be expected from a contagious disease.
In reality the excess mortality in the “first wave” was due to the implementation of lethal pandemic preparedness measures across the countries and regions of the world.
“In view of the fact that very different mortality rates are reported in different European countries, it is reasonable to assume that a differently aggressive therapy could be responsible for this.” Claus Köhnlein
Iatrocide was the real cause of excess deaths, not a viral pandemic. Inhumane new protocols killed patients in regions that applied those protocols in the first months of the declared pandemic.
This was followed by imposed coercive societal measures, which were damaging to individual health by spreading fear, panic, paranoia, psychological stress, social isolation, loss of work, business bankruptcy, etc.
Lethal Lockdowns
“The world has been fighting a virus from China with a public health policy from China that transforms the world into China.” Michale Senger
The consequences of lockdowns were as devastating as they were predictable. On the 23rd January 2020, the CCP ordered a lockdown of 58 million people in Hubei province on the basis of just 18 deaths. Wuhan, with a population of 9 million, is known as “Smog City” in China, however, air pollution was never considered to be a factor in these deaths.
Faked videos surfaced of people in Wuhan supposedly dropping dead in the streets which had the effect of terrifying the world. As a consequence, the Italian government (with close links to the CCP ) , put nearly 60 million of their own citizens in lockdown, the largest lockdown in history. It is only after the lockdowns were in effect that the excess mortality appeared. Excess deaths in Italy were hugely imbalanced towards the polluted north of the country and were likely substantially iatrogenic in nature.
It is clear that lockdowns had no real scientific justification and were pushed by people who were entirely aware of the inevitable devastating consequences. Lockdowns were guaranteed to kill millions of people and those pushing them already knew this.
Lockdowns always preceded excess mortality. Italy went into lockdown earlier than other countries, and its excess deaths came proportionately earlier too. At the other end of the scale, the UK instituted lockdowns last, and was the last to see a mortality spike. The picture is similar in the US, where no excess deaths were apparent prior to lockdown, but a sudden spike comes immediately after.
Japan imposed border controls but did not mandate an internal lockdown. The country experienced no excess mortality in 2020, in spite of PCR generated “case” numbers increasing. Excess deaths became apparent in 2022 only after a high proportion of the Japanese population was “vaccinated”.
This is hard for lockdown advocates and proponents of the viral theory in general to explain.
The medical establishment systematically withdrew normal care for everyone and attacked doctors who refused to comply. In virtually the entire Western world, antibiotic prescriptions fell by approximately 50% of the pre-Covid rates. About half of all “covid” death certificates list bacterial pneumonia as a “comorbidity”.
The countries experiencing high excess mortality at this time were all actively isolating their elderly population and denying them medical care. Spanish soldiers who went into care homes found residents who had been abandoned dead in their beds. It was reported that in French care homes “bodies have been left decomposing in bedrooms”.
Mask Madness
Masks have caused immeasurable harm to individuals’ physical and mental health, caused conflict and division in society, and, shamefully, have disproportionately harmed young children in particular.
A group of concerned parents in Florida sent six masks to the University of Florida for analysis. The analysis found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with pathogenic, pneumonia-causing bacteria. Inhaling bacteria, together with the low oxygen and high CO2 conditions caused by mask-wearing has undoubtedly caused many cases of bacterial pneumonia.
“It is not unreasonable to ask whether the logic has not been inverted: Is COVID-19-assignment an incorrect cause-assignment for what is in fact bacterial pneumonia?”
Dr. Denis Rancourt
Mortality rates in Kansas counties with and without mask mandates were studied by Dr. Zacharias Fögen who concluded that:
“Results from this study strongly suggest that mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths…compared to no mask mandates.”
Midazolam Murders
The powerful sedative Midazolam was used to prematurely end the lives of tens of thousands of people (possibly more), and their deaths were attributed to “covid”. The elderly and vulnerable in Britain were given a high dose “euthanasia drug cocktail” of Midazolam and Morphine.
It was falsely claimed that hospitals were overwhelmed during the “first wave” of the alleged pandemic. In April 2020 A&E attendance was down 57% and bed occupancy was down 30% compared to the previous year in the UK.
There were 41,627 more deaths than the five-year average up to the 1st May 2020, and most of these occurred in April. 33,408 of these excess deaths mentioned “covid” on the death certificate, and most of these people were over the age of 85.
Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows that during April 2020 26,541 deaths occurred in care homes, an increase of 17,850 on the five-year average. This accounts for half the number of alleged “covid” deaths during the same period.
On the 19th March a directive was sent out to the NHS which required them to discharge all patients who they deemed did not require a hospital bed. NHS trusts were told that “they must adhere” to the new directive rapidly (within 2 hours of the decision being made).
This directive meant that thousands of people who required medical treatment and attention in hospital were discharged into care homes. Many of them would not survive.
Midazolam is a benzodiazepine drug used for anaesthesia, procedural sedation, and to treat severe agitation. It is a drug used in palliative care for dying patients. In the US it is used as a sedative during executions by lethal injection.
Midazolam is used before medical procedures and surgery to cause drowsiness, relieve anxiety, and erase any memory of the event. It can cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems that may lead to permanent brain injury or death. Consequently, it should only be administered in a hospital or a doctors surgery that has the equipment needed to monitor the heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if breathing slows or stops.
Midazolam should be used with extreme caution in patients who have chronic kidney failure, and impaired liver or cardiac function. It should also be used with extreme caution in obese and elderly patients.
The NHS stocked up with two years’ worth of Midazolam in March 2020 and wanted to purchase much more. Some supplies were even diverted from France. The NHS needs to explain, to the public who fund it, why they bought a two years supply of a drug associated with respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest, to treat a disease that allegedly causes respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest.
Using it to treat people who are suffering from pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency allegedly due to “covid” could be lethal. The NHS stated that Midazolam should be used for comfort at end-of-life care due to “covid” to ease fear, anxiety, and agitation.
An NHS document states that Midazolam should be used for sedation prior to the patient requiring mechanical ventilation and states that the dose should be kept to a minimum and should be within the manufacturer’s guidelines. But a policy created for treating patients allegedly suffering anxiety due to “covid”, gives instructions to treat these patients with doses that are higher than the maximum recommended for the elderly or unwell in sedation guidelines.
Matt Hancock ordered twice the amount of out of hospital prescribing of Midazolam in April 2020 compared to 2019. In April 2019 up to 21,977 prescriptions for Midazolam were issued. However, in April 2020 45,033 prescriptions for Midazolam were issued which is a 104.91% increase. These prescriptions weren’t issued in hospitals, they were issued by GP practices, which can only mean they were issued for end-of-life “care”.
This huge surge in Midazolam prescriptions out of hospital, was concomitant with a huge surge in alleged “covid” deaths. An identical pattern can be seen for January 2021. The excess deaths in the UK (during the alleged covid pandemic waves in early 2020 and early 2021) correlate almost perfectly with spikes in Midazolam 10mg/2ml use. This is the injectable euthanasia form and not the anti-anxiety oral form of the drug.
Care home deaths were 205% up in April 2020 compared to April 2019. The vast majority of alleged “covid” deaths were people over the age of 85. There is a strong correlation between the over prescribing of Midazolam and the premature ending of life, with the deaths being recorded as “covid”.
60% of alleged “covid” deaths occurred in those who suffered learning difficulties and disabilities. Those with learning difficulties and in “care” were much more likely to have a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order placed on them without the victim or their family being informed. Carers and NHS staff then used this as justification to put the victim on end-of-life care, which involves the use of Midazolam.
According to a Care Quality Commission (CQC) statement in August 2020:
“Providers should always work to prevent avoidable harm or death for all those they care for. Protocols, guidelines, and triage systems should be based on equality of access to care and treatment. If they are based on assumptions that some groups are less entitled to care and treatment than others, this would be discriminatory. It would also potentially breach human rights, including the right to life, even if there were concerns that hospital or critical care capacity may be reached.”
The two-year supply of Midazolam was depleted by October 2020 according to NHS documents. Once these were replenished the stocks were again depleted by the beginning of February 2021.
With over 80% of all “covid” deaths in 2020 taking place in long term care homes, without these deaths there would have been no “pandemic”, no fear or panic, and perhaps no COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout.
British MP Andrew Bridgen wrote: “I have been supplied with lots of evidence from people who believe their relatives died due to the medical interventions brought in as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic”.
Former Pfizer scientist Dr Mike Yeadon PhD believes over 100,000 people were killed by government protocols using Midazolam and Morphine.
The evidence suggests that in reality we were ordered to stay home, not to protect the NHS, but to enable prematurely ending the lives of the elderly and vulnerable which was falsely attributed to “covid”.
Lethal Ventilators
In the early days of the “pandemic” there was a lot of talk about ventilators. Were there enough? Could we get more? Should we 3D print our own? Should companies re-tool their factories to make more? This media narrative was not consistent with the real science of the situation.
Ventilation is NOT a treatment for alleged respiratory viruses. Mechanical ventilation is not, and never has been, recommended treatment for respiratory infection of any kind. According to Dr Matt Strauss:
“Ventilators do not cure any disease. They can fill your lungs with air when you find yourself unable to do so yourself. They are associated with lung diseases in the public’s consciousness, but this is not in fact their most common or most appropriate application.”
Dr Strauss went on to explain that:
“There has never been a placebo randomised control trial of putting people on ventilators versus letting them struggle on. We therefore do not, strictly speaking, know whether those who survive their time on ventilator may have survived anyway, or whether some would-be survivors died because they were committed to a ventilator.”
Dr Thomas Voshaar a Pulmonologist and chairman of the Association of Pneumatological Clinics was also concerned:
“When we read the first studies and reports from China and Italy, we immediately asked ourselves why intubation was so common there. This contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.”
The patient has to be sedated during ventilation, so in addition to not breathing on their own, they are also not able to eat and drink. Too much oxygen, administered at too high a pressure, can cause terminal failure of the lungs as pointed out by Dr Voshaar:
“Invasive ventilation is fundamentally bad for patients. Even if the ventilator is optimally adjusted and the care is perfect, the treatment brings with it many complications. The lungs are sensitive to two things: excess pressure and excessive oxygen concentration in the air supplied.”
The WHO, CDC, and NHS all recommended “covid” patients be ventilated instead of using non-invasive methods. This was not a medical policy designed to best treat the patients, but rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of “covid” by preventing patients from exhaling aerosol droplets and preventing staff from inhaling them.
Putting someone on a ventilator who is suffering from “flu” , pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or any other condition which restricts breathing or affects the lungs, will not alleviate any of those symptoms. In fact, it will almost certainly make it worse, and will kill many of them.
Rather than treating respiratory infections, ventilators actually cause them. The cough reflex is suppressed in order to insert the ventilator tube into the trachea, so sedated patients cannot clear their airways. The resultant fluid build-up and bacterial growth can eventually cause serious bacterial infection. This condition is called “Ventilator-associated pneumonia” (VAP) which studies show affects up to 28% of all people put on ventilators and kills 20-55% of those affected.
Mechanical ventilation is also damaging to the physical structure of the lungs, causing “ventilator-induced lung injury”, which is often serious and can even result in death. Forcing air in and out of the lungs can physically damage the lungs irreparably. Even if it doesn’t kill patients, it can cause long-term damage and substantially reduced quality of life. One study found that, even after recovering, 58% of ventilated patients died within the next year.
It is estimated that 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of their disease. Around the world, between 66 and 86% of all “covid” patients put on ventilators died. According to Dr Paul Mayo:
“Putting a person on a ventilator creates a disease known as being on a ventilator.”
This policy was negligence at best, and potentially deliberate murder at worst. The misuse of ventilators could account for some of the increased mortality in 2020/21. The UK’s NHS, with their March 19th 2020 protocol, actually called mechanical ventilation the “preferred” option over non-invasive ventilation or other oxygen therapies.
A study of “covid” patients hospitalised between 1 March 2020 and 4 April 2020 was conducted by New York State’s largest health system. Among the 2,634 patients whose outcomes were known, the overall death rate was 21%, but it rose to 88% for those who received mechanical ventilation. In other words, most patients died after being placed on a mechanical ventilator.
In spite of these facts, Dr Anthony Fauci was pushing for “covid” patients to be treated with ventilators and was calling for an additional 30,000 ventilators for New Yorkers suffering from “covid”.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo also reiterated the need for thousands of ventilators claiming that “we’re following the data and the science.” In reality, the data and science showed that most people who were placed on a ventilator died.
Remdesivir Poisoning
Remdesivir was developed as an antiviral drug by Gilead Sciences and was first tested during the “Ebola” outbreak in 2014. The drug was found to have a very high death rate (over 50%) so was not pursued further at that time. In the early months of 2020, however, the drug was used in “covid” trials and performed just as bad. Not only was the drug ineffective but it also had serious and life-threatening side effects, including kidney failure and liver damage.
On May 2 2020, Remdesivir was approved for emergency use to treat “covid” after Dr Anthony Fauci claimed a study had found it could reduce recovery time and reduce mortality.
According to an article from the Alliance for Human Research and Protection (AHRP):
“Fauci has a vested interest in Remdesivir. He sponsored the clinical trial whose detailed results have not been peer-reviewed. Furthermore, he declared the tenuous results to be ‘highly significant,’ and pronounced Remdesivir to be the new ‘standard of care.’ Fauci made the promotional pronouncement while sitting on a couch in the White House, without providing a detailed news release; without a briefing at a medical meeting or in a scientific journal — as is the norm and practice, to allow scientists and researchers to review the data.”
A Chinese study on Remdesivir, published in The Lancet (April 29th , 2020) , was stopped because of serious adverse events in 16 (12%) of the patients compared to four (5%) of the patients in the placebo group.
Fauci dismissed this study as “not adequate”. The Chinese study denigrated by Fauci, was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, peer-reviewed, published study in a “reputable” journal, with all data available. In contrast, the NIAIDGilead study results, that the Remdesivir approval was based on, had not been published in the peer-reviewed literature and details of the findings had not been shared.
The primary outcomes of the study that led to Remdesivir’s emergency use approval were changed on April 16, 2020 and these changes were posted on clinicaltrials.gov.
Previously there was an 8-point scale, which also included the deceased patients, but this was changed to a 3-point scale, leaving the deceased patients out of the assessment and which also only measured the time until recovery or release from hospital. According to the AHRP:
“Changing primary outcomes after a study has commenced is considered dubious and suspicious.”
The change in primary outcome measures raised serious concerns for many scientists but this was largely ignored by the mainstream media who parroted Fauci’s promotional script instead.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA), the regulator of medicinal products in the European Union, performed a safety review of Remdesivir on account of some patients developing serious kidney problems after being given the drug.
The WHO reported that in its own trial called “Solidarity” Remdesivir not only failed to produce any measurable benefit in terms of mortality reduction, but that it also didn’t reduce the need for ventilators, or the length of hospital stays.
Fauci studiously ignored this study too. Gilead commented that “it is unclear if any conclusive findings can be drawn from the [Solidarity] study results,” because the trial hadn’t been peer reviewed or published in a scholarly journal. This is disingenuous because it was a multi-centre, global trial involving more than 11,300 adults with “covid” in 405 hospitals in 30 countries.
According to the WHO:
“Multiple small trials with different methodologies may not give us the clear, strong evidence we need about which treatments help to save lives. This large, international study is designed to generate the robust data we need, to show which treatments are the most effective.”
The study funded by Fauci’s NIAID was finally published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The only alleged benefit reported was a shorter recovery time for patients receiving Remdesivir compared to those in the placebo group and that was based on seriously flawed underlying data.
The placebo group in the Remdesivir study did not receive a real placebo. Instead, most of the patients got a “placebo” containing the same ingredients as Remdesivir (except the supposedly anti-viral agent) e.g., sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin, which can itself cause serious problems.
John Beaudoin has called for a criminal investigation into the drug, citing data for Massachusetts, he estimates Remdesivir may have killed 100,000 people in the US alone. He tweeted “They know, or they wilfully refuse to know. Either way, it’s homicide.”
Beaudoin found 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from 1 January 2021 to 30 November 2022 just in Massachusetts and he believes Remdesivir is the cause. He tweeted “Thousands dead in Massachusetts ARF (Acute Renal Failure) likely due to Remdesivir. This requires CRIMINAL investigation.”
On 20 November 2020, the WHO issued a recommendation against the use of Remdesivir in hospitalised patients, regardless of disease severity, as there was no evidence that Remdesivir improved survival and other outcomes.
On 22 April 2022, the WHO changed its recommendation following the publication of data from a single clinical trial. WHO’s updated recommendation is that Remdesivir can be used in mild or moderate “covid” patients who are at high risk of hospitalisation.
Dr. Paul Marik, a pulmonary and critical care specialist and founding member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, explained that during the “pandemic” the only drug he was allowed to prescribe was Remdesivir. When he refused to follow the Remdesivir protocol, he was subjected to a “sham review,” an unofficial but widely acknowledged process in which a “troublesome” doctor is accused of wrongdoing and forced out of practice. He was eventually sacked and reported to the National Practitioner Databank and the Board of Medicine.
There are financial incentives in the U.S to report doctors like Dr Marik since the U.S. government pays hospitals a 20% upcharge on the entire hospital bill if Remdesivir is used. According to Dr Marik:
“We know, according to the WHO, Remdesivir increases your risk of kidney failure 20 fold. It increases your risk of dying by about 4%. It has no place in medicine. Yet the Federal Government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if you prescribe this toxic [and ineffective] medication. So, you can see how the hospitals and health care systems are now subservient to industry rather than doing what’s best for their patients.”
In April 2022, the FDA, shockingly, even approved Remdesivir as the only “covid” treatment for children under 12, including babies as young as 28 days. To make matters worse Remdesivir was also approved for outpatient use in children, which was unprecedented.
Lawsuits are piling up alleging Remdesivir killed “covid” Patients. Two women are suing Kaiser Permanente and Redlands Community Hospital in California for giving Remdesivir to their husbands without consent. Both men died from kidney and organ failure after being given the drug.
Also in California, lawsuits have been filed on behalf of at least 14 families against medical providers for prescribing Remdesivir without providing the necessary information about it, leading to the patients’ deaths.
Another wrongful death suit was filed in Nevada, after a patient died of kidney failure and respiratory failure a week after being given Remdesivir.
According to Dr. Bryan Ardis who spoke at the Health Freedom Conference:
“People did not die of Covid-19, they died from Remdesivir. Remdesivir has been proven to cause kidney failure which leads to pulmonary oedema. Officials are calling this secondary pneumonia from Covid, no it wasn’t, they are shutting down everybody’s kidneys with Remdesivir, causing their lungs to fill with fluid, and they are drowning them to death.”
Dr Ardis continued:
“They are using Remdesivir the same way that they used gas chambers to destroy people in Germany. This is how they’re doing it, and perpetuating those deaths, using a drug in hospitals.”
Remdesivir is not exclusively an American problem, as it has also been used in the UK, although to a lesser extent. The NHS website claims, “it’s used to treat early COVID-19 infection and help to prevent more severe symptoms.” According to the NHS, those in the “highest risk group” are eligible for Remdesivir:
“If you are in the highest risk group you may be sent a letter and a lateral flow test that you can do at home, should you develop symptoms of COVID-19. You must report your COVID-19 lateral flow test result on GOV.UK.”
Those that report a positive result on the completely useless lateral flow test will then receive a text, email, or phone call from the NHS. But if they don’t the situation can get “urgent”:
“If you have not been contacted within 24 hours of your positive test, but think you are eligible for COVID-19 treatments, call your GP surgery, specialist or 111. They can make an urgent referral if needed.”
They continue: “You will then be assessed (over the phone) to see if Remdesivir is right for you. If it’s suitable, they’ll tell you where to get your treatment, how to get there and how to return home safely. This will usually be by text, email or phone.”
It’s difficult to comprehend in what circumstances an ineffective, toxic, and potentially lethal drug would be “suitable” or “right” for anyone. But the NHS insists that “it’s important that you complete the course” warning that “common side effects of Remdesivir include headaches and feeling sick.” They forgot to mention renal failure, pulmonary oedema, and death.
It is outrageous that Remdesivir remains a primary treatment for “covid”, despite the research showing it is not effective and can cause high rates of organ failure and death. This drug should never have been approved for use in the first place and should be withdrawn from use immediately.
Conclusions.
The actions of governments around the world were malicious and harmful, resulting in the premature ending of many lives. There was no pandemic. It was government-imposed measures that caused the excess mortality during the alleged “first wave” and beyond.
If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had just continued with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality.
Lockdowns, masks, Midazolam, invasive ventilators and Remdesivir are all demonstrably harmful and often lethal. These measures were ostensibly introduced to protect against a virus that has never been properly isolated and proven to exist. “Case” numbers were generated by a PCR test that was thoroughly discredited by independent scientists in 2020 in order to generate a pseudopandemic.
Division and nastiness spread in our societies. Moral self-righteousness took a hold and there was hateful recrimination for anyone not going along with “the science”. We saw a rise in the kind of superstitious thinking that many of us thought had been left behind in the Middle Ages.
The covid psy-op and response was a full-scale multi-faceted state and iatrogenic attack against populations, and against societal support structures, which caused all the excess mortality, in every jurisdiction.
We need genuine independent investigations with consequences to determine exactly who was responsible for these deaths and to prevent protocolists from ever killing one patient to supposedly save others in the future. Charges of murder would seem completely reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
The NHS has committed one of the greatest crimes against humanity in living memory, cynically using fear, compliance, ignorance, and trust. Many people clapped on command while NHS staff practiced their dance routines.
“Midazolam Matt” Hancock, the former UK Health Secretary who oversaw the “pandemic” response in the UK, should be held to account as should everyone else complicit in these crimes against humanity.
References
1) All-cause mortality during COVID-19 – No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response, Denis Rancourt. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341832637_All-cause_mortality_during_COVID19_No_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response
2) There Was No Pandemic – An essay by Denis Rancourt. https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic
3) Study published by a top British Biomedical Scientist proves the Covid-19 Fraud is a Crime against Humanity BY THE EXPOSÉ ON DECEMBER 3, 2021 https://expose-news.com/2021/12/03/new-study-proves-covid-is-a-fraud/
4) The PCR Scam: PCR Does Not Detect SARS-CoV-2. BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON FEBRUARY 24, 2022 https://expose-news.com/2022/02/24/the-pcr-scam-pcr-does-not-detect-sars-cov-2/
5) Measuring the Mandates-Questioning the State’s Response to COVID-19. Eric F Coppolino .https://substack.com/@planetwavesfm
6) An Estimated 30,000 Americans Were Killed by Ventilators & Iatrogenesis in April 2020, B Michael Senger. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/10/no_author/an-estimated-30000-americans-were-killed-by-ventilators-iatrogenesis-in-april-2020/
7) The Earliest Days of the Italian Pandemic, or: Why Nobody Wants to Talk About February 2020 Anymore, eugyppius: a plague chronicle. https://www.eugyppius.com/p/the-earliest-days-of-the-italian
8) There Was No Covid-19 Pandemic-Occam’s Razor, the biology of viruses, the naked ambition for power and the Philosopher’s Stone. William Hunter Duncan. https://williamhunterduncan.substack.com/p/there-was-no-covid-19-pandemic
9) Where’s the Emergency? Viroliegy, Mike Stone. https://mikestone.substack.com/
10) Iatrocide: The Midazolam Murders May 13, 2023 UK Reloaded Steve Cook by Simon Lee, Science Officer for AnewUK https://ukreloaded.com/iatrocide-the-midazolam-murders/
11) “Midazolam Murders: Were the elderly in Long Term Care homes killed with euthanasia drugs and labeled as COVID-19 deaths?” Dr William Makis MD. Druthers.
12) “FACT: Midazolam Matt Hancock turned Care Homes into Concentration Camps where the Elderly & Vulnerable were given Lethal Injections to create the illusion of a COVID Pandemic.” THE EXPOSÉ MARCH 22, 2023
https://expose-news.com/2023/03/22/midazolam-matt-hancock-turned-care-homes-into-concentration-camps/
13) Never Forget: April 2020 Study Found That Most New York Covid Patients on Ventilators Died While Fauci and Cuomo Pushed for More Ventilators-The Expose Rhoda Wilson June 26, 2022. https://expose-news.com/2022/06/26/study-found-most-covid-patients-on-ventilators-died/
14) Doctors in USA admit they killed Patients during the Pandemic by putting them on Ventilators-The Expose Rhoda Wilson January 24, 2023.
https://expose-news.com/2023/01/24/american-doctors-admitted-to-risking-lives-on-ventilators/
15) Did Protocolists Euthanise Covid-19 Patients with Ventilators and Sedatives “To Save Other Patients”, >50% kill rate? Up to 70% of covid-19 Deaths Due to Ventilators-By James Lyons-Weiler.
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/you-are-not-ready-for-this-did-protocolists
16) COVID19: Are ventilators killing people?-OffGuardian Kit Knightly.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/06/covid19-are-ventilators-killing-people/
17) Iatrocide: Lethal Ventilators ARTICLE BY ANEW UK SCIENCE OFFICER, SIMON LEE May 21, 2023 Steve Cook https://ukreloaded.com/iatrocide-lethal-ventilators/
18) IATROCIDE: REMDESIVIR – ARTICLE BY SIMON LEE OF ANEW UK July 18, 2023 Steve Cook https://ukreloaded.com/culling-the-herd-mass-murder-disguised-as-medicine/
19) Remdesivir estimated to have killed 100,000 Americans BY RHODA WILSON ON MARCH 15, 2023 https://expose-news.com/2023/03/15/Remdesivir-killed-100000-americans/
20) Criminal Investigation for excess deaths due to Remdesivir, Dr. Joseph Mercola, 10 March 2023 https://mymedicalfreedom.org/criminal-investigation-for-excess-deaths-due-to-remdesivir/
21) Remdesivir Causes Renal Failure, Hospital Protocols Are Killing People BY RHODA WILSON ON SEPTEMBER 2, 2021
https://expose-news.com/2021/09/02/Remdesivir-causes-renal-failure-hospitalprotocols-are-killing-people/
22) Most Covid-19 Deaths were a direct result of the administration of Midazolam or Remdesivir – By Dr Mike Yeadon BY THE EXPOSÉ ON OCTOBER 11, 2021 https://expose-news.com/2021/10/11/dr-mike-yeadon-midazolam-Remdesivir-donot-comply/comment-page-1/
23) Anthony Fauci: 40 Years of Lies From AZT to Remdesivir Torsten Engelbrecht & Konstantin Demeter
https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/27/anthony-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-toRemdesivir/
24) https://www.nhs.uk/medicines/Remdesivir-veklury/
1st March 2024 – ‘A detailed summary of PANDA’s current understanding (an important read…)
‘The nature of the events of the covid era’
‘…For instance, in November 2023 we published a revised “vaccine stance” which, though building on work we had done over the past few years, took us to what many regard as a radical position, certainly in comparison to the position we had taken a year before.
It is well known that our material to date is highly critical of governments’ actions over the past 4 years. However, most of our articles, especially those written prior to the past year or so, explicitly or implicitly accept the proposition that there had been an event which justifies the use of the word “pandemic”, and that this had been caused by “the virus”.
In our revised vaccine position, we stated inter alia that in our view the “Covid vaccines” were simply not required because, under any reasonably useful or sensible definition of the word, we had not had a pandemic.
This position statement seeks to set out in more detail what our current thinking is in relation to this relatively new position.’
https://pandata.org/position-covid-era/
11th March 2024 – Dr. Dawn Michael via X (click on the link below to read the responses and experiences):
‘Imagine breaking your leg, arm or having to have surgery and going to the hospital to get it fixed, they demand that you take a Covid test, it comes up positive, they admit you to the Covid ward, give you the hospital protocol of Remdesivir, it shuts down your kidney, cardiac arrest, vent you and then you die. The hospital gets paid thousands of dollars for your death, and they report it as a Covid death. If you think this is just a made up horror story it is not, thousands of people died this way over the past few years and it continues today in hospitals around America.’
https://twitter.com/DawnsMission/status/1767237121541345289
18th March 2024 – I’ve just learned of another form of harm by medication (or medical intervention) – via the PSSD Network. Please note that iatrocide is death by medical action, iatrogenic is harm by medical action:
DR. ANTONEI CSOKA
Biogerontologist, Associate Professor in the Department of Anatomy at Howard University
“Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) and related disorders such as PFS likely represent types of iatrogenic epigenetic damage previously unseen in human history. On the individual level the consequences are catastrophic, and there may be population-level effects as well. Increasing our knowledge and understanding of these increasingly-prevalent disorders is paramount.”
— Private Email, Sep 2, 2023
The meaning of IATROGENIC is harms or illness induced unintentionally by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedures.
